Legal Opinion

Brotman v. Brotman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 31, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The husband brought a suit for divorce alleging three statutory causes of action. The testimony discloses that the parties to this marriage were persons of no moral fibre. The learned Advisory Master interrupted the hearings and granted a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The proofs, which we have carefully examined, do not sustain that charge.

There was also an order placing the custody of the infant child of the marriage with its paternal grandfather and grandmother. Such order seemed, under the proofs in. the case, to be in all respects prudent.

The decree of divorce, as pointed out,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sm v. SjNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Fitzgibbon v. FitzgibbonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  3. New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. J.L.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. Mc v. McNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API