Legal Opinion

State v. Sanders

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 16, 2016No. 2015-KP-2136PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Denied. Relator’s claims are not cognizable on collateral review and/or repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. See also Wainwright v. Torna, 455 U.S. 586, 587-88, 102 S.Ct. 1300, 1301, 71 L.Ed.2d 475 (1982); Ross v. Moffitt, 417 U.S. 600, 615-19, 94 S.Ct. 2437, 2446-8, 41 L.Ed.2d 341 (1974). We attach hereto and make a part hereof the District Court’s written reasons denying relator’s application.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Melinie v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  3. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Wainwright v. TornaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. BushLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Of Louisiana v. Jason Jarrell SpikesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API