State v. Sanders
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Per curiam
Denied. Relator’s claims are not cognizable on collateral review and/or repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. See also Wainwright v. Torna, 455 U.S. 586, 587-88, 102 S.Ct. 1300, 1301, 71 L.Ed.2d 475 (1982); Ross v. Moffitt, 417 U.S. 600, 615-19, 94 S.Ct. 2437, 2446-8, 41 L.Ed.2d 341 (1974). We attach hereto and make a part hereof the District Court’s written reasons denying relator’s application.
Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Melinie v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wainwright v. TornaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. BushLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Of Louisiana v. Jason Jarrell SpikesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020