United States Building & Loan Ass'n v. Midvale Home Finance Corp.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ELIAS HANSEN, Chief Justice.
The unit holders and cross-appellants have filed a petition for rehearing. One of the grounds urged for the rehearing is that this court was in error in refusing to pass upon the question of whether or not the unit holders were entitled to a homestead in and to the property which they contracted to purchase from the Midvale Home Finance Corporation. United States Bldg. & L. Ass’n v. Midvale Home Finance Corp. et al., 86 U. 506, 44 P. (2d) 1090, 1095. In the answer to the unit holders’ petition for a rehearing, the plaintiff joins in the request that we dispose of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Volker-Scowcroft Lumber Co. v. VanceUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Payson Exch. Sav. Bank v. TietjenUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Kimball v. SalisburyUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Bunker v. CoonsUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- Giesy-Walker Co. v. BriggsUtah Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilcox v. ClowardUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Zion's Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Mountain-Lakes Poultry Farms, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1940