D. Rosenbaum's Sons v. Davis & Andrews Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
Appeal from, the chancery court of Lauderdale county. Hon. Sam "Whitman, Chancellor. Suit by D. Rosenbaum’s Sons and others against Davis & Andrews Company and others, begun by attachment in chancery. From a decree for defendant,, complainants appeal. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
Appellants as complainants in the court below, sued out an attachment in chancery against appellee, a nonresident corporation doing a milling and wholesale grain business in the city of Memphis, Tenn. It appears that one W. S. McCallum, a broker in the city of Meridian,, received certain quotations by wire from Davis & An*280drews Company as follows: “Three cars each natural chops and corn one dollar and twelve cents, seventy-seven cents, if kiln dried one dollar and seventeen cents, eighty-one cents.” Mr. McCallum upon receipt'of this telegram undertook to sell a carload of the chops and corn…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bonds v. GarveyMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burt v. RobertsMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- Sharp v. Brookhaven Pressed Brick Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1919
- Evans-Terry Co. v. Liberty MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
- Fossum v. HallandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919