Nowak v. Shedd-Bartush Foods, Inc.

This case comes to this Court by way of leave to appeal from a decisiQU. of the work*293men’s compensation appeal board. Tbe question for decision in this matter is tbe interpretation of part 2, § 9 of tbe workmen’s compensation act, CLS 1961, § 412.9 (Stat Ann 1960 Rev § 17.159), and its application to facts with which there is no controversy. This appears to be a case'of the first impression in this State. The pertinent portion of part 2, § 9 of the act states:

“(d) Weekly payments to any injured employee shall be reduced by the additional amount provided for a dependent child * * when such…