Legal Opinion

Binzel v. Viehmann

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1940No. 8,067PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Johnson

This is an appeal by defendant Julia Viehmann as administratrix of the estate of Herman Binzel, deceased, from a judgment for $3,505.03% and costs rendered in favor of plaintiff Mary Binzel pursuant to verdict of jury.

The specifications of error which we must consider first are that the court erred in overruling, first, defendant’s general demurrer to the complaint; second, her objection to the introduction of testimony on behalf of plaintiff; third, her motion for nonsuit; and, fourth, her motion for a directed verdict. The fifth and last specification which must be considered is that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gravelin v. PorierMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Marcellus v. WrightMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Roberts v. SinnottMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Fabian v. CollinsMontana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Fleming v. Consolidated Motor Sales Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Henschel v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Kaufman v. KaufmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Twin Bridges Truck City, Inc. v. HallingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Mitchell v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Goldberg v. GoldbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API