Gilmore v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

As we understand appellant’s contention, he claimed the right to carry his pistol from his barber shop to his home for a lawful purpose, and a charge to that effect was given. We can not tell from the record the exact relative locations of the park to which appellant admitted he went after he got said pistol at his barber shop. He said he could have gone straight to his home from said barber shop with said pistol, but instead he went first to a park to get his cows, .carrying said pistol. The cows had gone off down the creek, and he went after them…