Legal Opinion

People v. Quiroz

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 2013No. B229432PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*68Opinion

HOFFSTADT, J.*

A jury unanimously agrees that a defendant is guilty of murder. Must all jurors either unanimously agree defendant is the killer, or unanimously agree that he aided and abetted the killer? Appellant Raul Becerra Quiroz (Quiroz) argues that Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 [147 L.Ed.2d 435, 120 S.Ct. 2348] (Apprendi) requires all jurors to agree on the same theory of legal liability. We disagree. We also reject Quiroz’s arguments that the People’s request for an aiding and abetting instruction deprived him of his right to counsel and that such an instruction may…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. (HC) Gutierrez Jr. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. (HC) Johnson v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. People v. Bradford CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Briseno CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. Carter CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API