Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Franek

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1942No. 17707PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George J.A. Seymour, who conducts his business under the trade name, Seymour and Company, alleges that Richard J. Franek is indebted to him in the sum of $700 as the result of services rendered under a written contract by which Franek agreed to pay a commission of 4 per cent. on a loan which Seymour undertook to secure for him on certain real estate owned by Franek in the city of New Orleans. Franek admits that he entered into the contract with Seymour, and that he, Franek, has obtained a loan of $17,500 on his property, but he denies that Seymour was instrumental in securing the said loan,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MansonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Harvey v. WintersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Taylor v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  4. Junk v. Golden Ranch Sugar & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  5. Taylor v. JaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mid-South Mortgage Co. v. BartmessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. State of Louisiana v. Kenry James LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API