Legal Opinion

Hultquist v. Novak

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1938No. 31,453PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

These cases arise out of a controversy over the coverage of a liability insurance policy issued by the garnishee to the defendant. The trial court made findings and ordered judgments in favor of the garnishee. The plaintiffs moved for new trials and come here on appeal from orders denying their motions.

The minor plaintiff, Eobert Hultquist, on October 6, 1933, when he was 11 years of age, went to the defendant’s filling station at Twenty-fourth street and Hiawatha avenue, Minneapolis, and sought to purchase a penny’s worth of gasolene for the purpose of cleaning a tricycle. He…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lloyds Casualty Insurer v. McCraryTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cobbins v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Keystone Automated Equipment Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Jeffries v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Selective Logging Co. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API