Ermeling v. Bargh
Michigan Supreme Court
Case made from Gogebic; Haire, J. Assumpsit by L. R. Ermeling against Joseph S. Bargh, principal, and John D. Barry and H. E. Eos, sureties, on an attachment bond. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendants assign error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
June 25, 1895, Joseph S. Bargh commenced suit by attachment in justice’s court against L. R. Ermeling *168& Co., styling in the affidavit for the writ the said L. R. Ermeling & Co. as a foreign corporation. A bond in the penal sum of $200 was executed by Bargh, with defendants Eox and Barry as sureties thereon. The bond was executed to L. R. Ermeling & Co., its certain attorneys, etc., and was conditioned in the usual form to pay to said L. R. Ermeling & Co. all damages and costs it might sustain by reason of the issuing of the writ, if Bargh failed to recover judgment in said suit. The writ of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bargh v. L. R. Ermeling & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896