Kidd v. Industrial Commission
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
The claimant, Roy Kidd, was awarded compensation by an arbitrator for temporary total incapacity for work and for the permanent and complete loss of 50% of the use of his left foot. The Industrial Commission affirmed the arbitrator’s award and made special findings to the effect that the claimant was not entitled to be compensated for lost earnings under section 8(d)(1) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 48, par. 138.8(d)(1)), because section 10(g) of the Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 48, par. 138.10(g)) bars the use of overtime earnings in computing lost earnings.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Illinois Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n v. BlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Illinois Polygraph Society v. PellicanoIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Franklin County Coal Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
- Sroka v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harris v. Manor Healthcare Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Hayen v. County of OgleIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Hayen v. County of OgleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Ogle v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.