Legal Opinion

Slade & Etheridge v. Paschal

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1881PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Partnership. Contracts. Before Judge STEWART. Talbot Superior Court. March Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Speer, Justice.

The plaintiffs in error brought their suit against defendants as partners, to recover the amounts alleged to be due on certain notes signed by W. O. Paschal as agent. The declaration alleges that the notes were made and delivered to plaintiffs by the defendants as partners under the partnership name of W. O. Paschal, agent. To this suit Paschal made no defense, Neal filed pleas of general issue non est factum, and a special plea denying that he was at the time of giving said notes, or before or since, a partner of Paschal. Upon the issue thus made there was evidence introduced…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buckner v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Week v. Big Bunker Hill Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Mims v. Brook & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. McCrea v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Meinhard, Schaul & Co. v. Bedingfield Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API