Hartman Stock Farm v. Henley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Reid. November 9, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
The Hartman Stock Farm brought a suit upon a promissory note for $933, attaching to its petition a copy of the note. The defendants filed an answer in which they set up that the note was not binding upon them,' for the reason that an agent of the plaintiff represented to them that in the event that any of the purchasers of a certain horse (which, was the consideration of the note), and especially W. C. Abercrombie, W. J. Camp, and T. S. Abercrombie, should fail or refuse to sign the note with them, the note was to be a nullitjr, and not to be delivered to the plaintiff. The plaintiff demurred…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Heitmann v. Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- Storey v. StoreyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- Equitable Manufacturing Co. v. Hill-Atkinson Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Palmer-Murphey Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Farrell v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Mooney v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.