Legal Opinion
People v. Cowan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 14, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*795Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly declined to suppress certain statements he made to law enforcement officials on the ground that they were obtained in violation of his right to counsel. Although the defendant was represented by an attorney in connection with another burglary that took place in the Bronx at the time he made the statements, the law enforcement officials did not question the defendant about the Bronx burglary, and the two criminal matters were not “so closely related transactionally, or in space or time, that questioning on the unrepresented…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. DeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. CameronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. UpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Uriah M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Uriah M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. McCallaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. UpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013