Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Segrest v. Intown True Value Hardware, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1989No. 77739Published

1ConcurrenceBanke, Presiding Judge

I agree that inasmuch as the trial court reaffirmed its grant of summary judgment to the appellee after the expiration of the 30-day period within which the appellants were required to serve and file a response to the motion, and inasmuch as the appellants still had not responded to the motion as of that time, the initial error committed by the trial court in ruling on the summary judgment motion prior to the expiration of the 30-day period was rendered harmless. I note, however, that the appellee states in its brief on appeal that “[t]he grant of summary judgment did not include the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mock v. CANTERBURY REALTY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Brunson v. C. B. A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API