Legal Opinion

Ploughe v. Indianapolis Railways, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1943No. 27,920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.

The appellant sued the appellees for damages for personal injuries. At the conclusion of the evidence the trial court directed a verdict for the appellees. Error is predicated on the overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new trial and this calls for a con- % sideration of the evidence.

On May 5, 1941, this court promulgated Rule 1-9, which became effective on September 1 of that year and continued in force until September 6, 1943, when Rule 1-9 of the 1943 Revision became operative. Prior to the last revision the rule read:

“The judge who presides at the trial of a cause shall rule on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hodshire v. Bingham, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. BissellIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Carr v. NoahIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Hunter v. BeranischIndiana Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. R. E. W. Construction Co. v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Harp v. Vanderburgh Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Ex Parte FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API