Ploughe v. Indianapolis Railways, Inc.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.
The appellant sued the appellees for damages for personal injuries. At the conclusion of the evidence the trial court directed a verdict for the appellees. Error is predicated on the overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new trial and this calls for a con- % sideration of the evidence.
On May 5, 1941, this court promulgated Rule 1-9, which became effective on September 1 of that year and continued in force until September 6, 1943, when Rule 1-9 of the 1943 Revision became operative. Prior to the last revision the rule read:
“The judge who presides at the trial of a cause shall rule on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hodshire v. Bingham, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. BissellIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Carr v. NoahIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Hunter v. BeranischIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- R. E. W. Construction Co. v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Harp v. Vanderburgh Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Ex Parte FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945