Legal Opinion

Hickman v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 23, 1992No. 01-91-00240-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MIRABAL, Justice.

A jury found appellant, William Wayne Hickman, guilty of possession of at least 400 grams of methamphetamine, including adulterants and dilutants. The trial court assessed punishment at 25-years confinement. We reverse and remand.

In his first point of error, appellant asserts the evidence was insufficient to prove he possessed at least 400 grams of methamphetamine, including adulterants and dilutants.

In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and consider whether any rational trier of fact…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility RatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API