Legal Opinion

La Lumia v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1965PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, pursuant to section 51 of the Civil Bights Law, to recover damages for the invasion of privacy, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 1, 1964, as, in denying their motion, made pursuant to statute (CPLR 3024, subds. [a], [b]; CP'LR 3015, subd. [d]), to require plaintiff to serve an amended *669complaint, declared: (1) that the complaint stated a good cause of action against both defendants; and (2) that damages for mental stress are recoverable. Order modified by striking out the provision that the complaint states a good…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mendelson v. BoettgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Debobes v. ButterlyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  2. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. City of Newburgh v. SARNADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Clark v. Pine Hill Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Gregoris Motors v. Nissan Motor Corp. in USADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API