Battle v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MlKELL, Judge.
We granted Frank Battle, Sr.’s application for interlocutory review of the order denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to an insurance fraud investigation to clarify that, under Franks v. State,1 the failure to leave a copy of the supporting affidavit at the searched premises does not render the warrant void. In addition, because the affidavit in the case at bar established probable *533cause to search Battle’s premises, we affirm the trial court’s order.
1. We first dispense with Battle’s attack upon the trial court’s factual findings. Three principles guide our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- State v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Watts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Stanford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Franks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Russell TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Battle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005