Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. White

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided January 31, 1994No. NMCM 92 1751Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWelch, Senior Judge

I agree with the majority opinion except as noted below.

With regard to the first assignment of error, I disassociate myself from both the majority’s conclusion that the Air Force non-commissioned officer security guards were the appellant’s “superior” noncommissioned officers and the stated rationale for that conclusion. My position is based on the arguments in the briefs of both the appellate defense counsel and the appellate government counsel (i.e., an officer or noncommissioned officer of one armed force is the “superior” of someone in another armed force only under the circumstances…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. MerriweatherU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API