Legal Opinion

Miller v. Department of Mental Health

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1987No. Docket 91115PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. R. Carnovale, J.

The Department of Mental Health appeals as of right from a ruling of the probate judge that the assets of a certain support trust of which petitioner was the beneficiary could not be considered by the department in determining petitioner’s liability for services provided by the department. We reverse.

Petitioner Carol Miller, age forty-five, has been a resident of the Caro Regional Mental Health Facility, a state mental health facility, for twenty-nine years, since 1958. In February, 1985, the department recalculated petitioner’s liability for payment for services provided by the department…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ledbetter v. Brown City Savings BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Coverston v. KelloggMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. In Re Sykes EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. In Re Chavez EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re Ferguson EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API