Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Harrah's Club

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1964No. 19177_1PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.

For many years respondent Harrah’s Club 1 has regulated strictly the dress and appearance of its employees who come in contact with the public. One of the rules of the establishment prohibits 2 the wearing by such employees of any jewelry or other personal adornment on the uniform. This rule is enforced by ■daily inspections conducted by manage.ment personnel before the employees go on duty. The rule has been strictly enforced in the past against badges, pins, and buttons showing religious, political, .or social affiliations.

One day in 1962 one of the inspectors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Essex Wire Corporation, a Corporation, Doing Business as Essex Wire Corporation of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Floridan Hotel of Tampa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Boeing Airplane Company, a Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  5. Kimble Glass Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Larand Leisurelies, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. Unión Independiente de Empleados TelefónicosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
  3. Serv-Air, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. Pay'n Save Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Burger King Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API