Legal Opinion
Doud v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 28, 2003No. 2:02-cv-71749PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JULIAN ABELE COOK, Jr., District Judge.
On August 18, 2003, the Plaintiff, Anita Doud (“Doud”) filed a motion for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 et seq. Three days later (August 21, 2003), the Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security, filed her response in opposition to the motion. For the reasons that are set forth below, this Court grants Doud’s motion for attorney fees.
I
This action arises from a claim that was filed on July 23, 1998 by Doud who seeks to obtain social security and disability benefits from the Social Security…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Clarence WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Federal Election Commission v. Congressman Charles G. RoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- United States v. 0.376 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cowart v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Knapp v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022