Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 1990No. CR 89-177PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. His appeal was never perfected. He filed a petition in the trial court for post-conviction relief pursuant to A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37. The primary allegation in the petition is that appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied the petition. We reverse and remand for a new trial because appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel.

Counsel is presumed to be competent. Ross v. State, 292 Ark. 663, 732 S.W.2d 143 (1987). Further, to prevail on an argument…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Wicoff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Helton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API