Legal Opinion

Norris v. Casel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 10,018PublishedCited by 32 opinions

From the Superior Court of Vigo county.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

— Action by appellee against appellant to recover damages for an assault and battery. Answer, the general denial; trial by jury; verdict for appellee for $125; appellant’s motion for a new trial overruled; exceptions; judgment on verdict, and appeal to this court.

The first error assigned is, “ that appellee’s complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute any good or sufficient cause of action.”

The complaint, omitting the title, etc., was as follows:

“The plaintiff complains of the defendant, and says, that on or about the 11th day of June, A. D. 1881, the defendant with force and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steinmetz v. KellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Cassady v. MagherIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mode v. BeasleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Daniels v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Ruhlman v. RuhlmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. PhippsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. NashIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API