Diecidue v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SHANNON, Judge.
The appellant-defendant has appealed from judgment and sentence entered against him for violation of the lottery laws of the State of Florida. The State has filed cross-assignment of error pointing to a certain instruction of the trial court.
The information upon which the defendant was tried was in three counts, the first of which charged that the defendant did unlawfully set up, promote or conduct a lottery for money, commonly known as “Bolita” or “Cuba”; the second count charged that he’ did unlawfully aid and assist in the setting, up; promoting or conducting of a lottery…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harrison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Victor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Holliday v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Driver v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Diecidue v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- McGough v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984