Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Rogina Inv. Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 4, 2008No. 1050161Published

1Opinion of the Court

991 So.2d 681 (2008)

Ronald GILBERT

v.

ROGINA INVESTMENT CORPORATION.

1050161.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 4, 2008.

Timothy L. Arnold, Bessemer, for appellant.

Henry I. Frohsin and Harriet Thomas Ivy of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C., Birmingham, for appellee.

COBB, Chief Justice.

Ronald Gilbert, the defendant in an action involving a dispute over a ground lease, appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Rogina Investment Corporation ("Rogina"). We affirm.

I. Background

Alabama appellate courts have addressed questions regarding the contract that is the subject of this…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Reed v. BD. OF TRUSTEES FOR AL. STATE UNIV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Ex Parte Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API