Legal Opinion · Dissent
Blanding v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 24, 1985No. C5-85-305Published
1DissentPopovich, Chief Judge
1. I respectfully dissent on several grounds. However, I totally agree with this court’s assumption of jurisdiction. In County of Hennepin v. Civil Rights Commission of Minneapolis, 355 N.W.2d 458 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), this court considered whether the district court had jurisdiction in an appeal from the Minneapolis Civil Rights Commission and affirmed a district court decision dismissing a petition for review for lack of jurisdicition. There were no dissents. County of Hennepin is a well-reasoned opinion which concludes jurisdiction in this court is grounded upon a legislative grant of power.
A…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Doe v. Commonwealth's Atty. for City of RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
- James L. Dronenburg v. Vice Admiral Lando Zech, Chief of Naval PersonnelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.