Legal Opinion

Allingham v. Allingham

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 28, 1959No. 18446PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

Defendant in error, Victoria Allingham, was plaintiff in an action in the district court which sought collection of arrearages in alimony. Her complaint contained two claims, the first of which was based on a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles, California, and an order of execution issued pursuant to that judgment which liquidated and fixed the amount of arrearage as of October 11, 1955, in the amount of $3250.00. The second claim demanded the amount of arrearages on the basis of the divorce decree and the agreement of the parties which had been incorporated in that decree. The…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Worthley v. WorthleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. HendrixSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  2. Talbot v. TalbotMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Beardshear v. BeardshearSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. Overman v. OvermanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Corley v. CorleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API