Parker-Smith v. Sto Corp.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kinser
This appeal involves claims alleging false advertising, breach of warranty, and fraud arising out of the application of a synthetic stucco material known as “Exterior Insulation Finish System” (EIFS) to a residential home. Because we conclude that the period of limitation in Code § 8.01-248 applies to the false advertising claims, we will affirm the circuit court’s judgment sustaining pleas of the statute of limitations as to those counts. We cannot, however, reach the merits of the counts alleging breach of warranty and fraud because the circuit court had independent grounds for dismissing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Evaluation Research Corp. v. AlequinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
- Yuzefovsky v. St. John's Wood ApartmentsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Patrick v. SummersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Vines v. BranchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Dudas v. Glenwood Golf Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sheets v. CastleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- McMillion v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Klaiber v. Freemason Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- L-3 Communications Corporation v. Serco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Hansen v. Stanley Martin Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.