Legal Opinion

Bert and Maria Abrenilla, Small Business Administration v. China Insurance Company, Ltd., Chung Kuo Insurance Company, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 20, 1989No. 88-1787PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

This is an action to recover the proceeds of a fire insurance policy after the destruction by fire of the insured structure. The insurance company defended on the ground that the plaintiff policy holders, Bert and Maria Abrenilla, had no insurable interest in the structure because they no longer owned the land on which the structure had rested. The case went to the jury on the issue of whether the Abrenillas retained an insurable interest in the structure because it was personalty. The jury returned a verdict of $15,500 in favor of the Abrenil-las.

On appeal to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Miller v. WaddinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Estus v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Energrey Enterprises, Inc. v. Oak Creek Energy Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1990
  2. Energrey Enterprises, Inc. v. Oak Creek Energy Systems, Inc. (In re Oak Creek Energy Farms, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1989
  3. Kamlesh K. Hemlani, individually and derivatively in the name of and on behalf of Radhi Puran Trust v. Manu & Anita MelwaniSupreme Court of Guam · 2025
  4. Canilao v. City Commercial Investments, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API