Legal Opinion

Tant v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1981No. 36776PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Justice.

This is an action by the state to condemn an automobile which was seized after allegedly having been used to. transport methaqualone, a controlled substance. Code Ann. § 79A-807 (e) (1) (Ga. L. 1974, pp. 221, 235; as amended). See generally, Code Ann. § 79A-828 (Ga. L. 1974, pp. 221, 258; 1975, pp. 919, 920; 1979, pp. 879-881). The appeal from the order of condemnation raises the issues of the constitutionality of the condemnation statute and the sufficiency of the evidence.

1. It is contended that Code Ann. § 79A-828, pursuant to which the vehicle was condemned, is violative…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. One 1976 Cadillac DeVille AutomobileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. State v. A 1971 DatsunNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Elrod v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. ONE 1977 CADILLAC ELDORADO AUTOMOBILEMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DELONG v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Lang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. Farley v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API