Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lake Bomoseen Ass'n v. Vermont Water Resources Board

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 15, 2005No. 04-220Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Reiber, J.,

¶ 25. concurring and dissenting. I concur in the Court’s holding that the decision of the Water Resources Board to reclassify the Lake Bomoseen Wetland is a rulemaking rather than an adjudicative proceeding. I do not agree, however, that this conclusion necessarily disposes of the ultimate question of whether the decision is appealable. The right to “a certain remedy, by having recourse to the laws” is of constitutional dimension in Vermont. Vt. Const, ch. I, art. 4. The Legislature may, to be sure, define and limit the legal remedies available to litigants, but where — as here —…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Killington v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. Perry v. Medical Practice BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Vincent v. Vermont State Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. Appeal of Stratton Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. Dutton v. Department of Social WelfareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API