Legal Opinion

Sword v. Lane

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Mandamus. Eelators apply for mandamus to dismiss attachment proceedings for a defect in the affidavit. The facts are .stated in the opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

Eelators apply for a mandamus requiring the respondent to dismiss a writ of attachment and all proceedings taken thereunder, on the ground that the •affidavit upon which the writ was based is insufficient.

The plaintiffs in the attachment were four persons, composing the firm of H. Brewer & Go., and residents of the *285county of Lenawee. The defendants in the attachment-are the relators in this case. The affidavit for the writ was made by Herbert E. Stout, one of the members of said firm, and reads as follows:

“ Herbert E. Stout, of said county, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Yorks v. PeckNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Geiges v. GreinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cottrell v. HathewayMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API