Huggins v. State

on rehearing.

April 16, 1919.

MORROW, Judge.

—We have carefully examined the record in the light of appellant’s motion for rehearing.

No request for the submission of the questions whether the rule of accomplice testimony governed the State’s witnesses having been made, their status would not be available to appellant upon appeal unless they came within the accomplice rule as a matter of law and there was not sufficient corroboration. We do not think they were accomplices as a matter of law. Sanchez v. State, 48 Texas Crim. Rep., 591; Wright v. State, 7 Texas Crim. App., 574; Allison v. State, 14…