People v. Quijada
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Defendant was convicted of escaping from the state prison at Folsom while confined as a prisoner therein under a conviction of robbery. The prosecution was instituted under section 105 of the Penal Code providing: “Every person confined in a state prison, for a term less than for life, who escapes therefrom, is punishable by imprisonment in a state prison for a term of not less than one year; said second term of imprisonment to commence from the time he would otherwise have been discharged from said prison.”
[1] The only point made by appellant is that the evidence is insufficient to show more…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
- Wheeler v. State ex rel. RobbinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. SiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Maynard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.