Legal Opinion
Troy v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 17, 1992No. 91-1161-KPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATRICK F. KELLY, Chief Judge.
In its motion for summary judgment, defendant Allstate Insurance Company seeks a determination that the homeowner insurance policies it issued did not provide coverage for damages resulting from the insured’s alleged sexual molestation of a child. The estate of the insured, J.M. Neal, and the plaintiff contend that coverage exists under the insurance policies for unintended damages that result from an intentional act.
A hearing on the motion was held on April 15, 1992. At that time, the court announced its decision. Consistent with its decision…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. MugaveroNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Spruill Motors, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Rodriguez v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Gowing v. Great Plains Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- Allstate Insurance v. RoelfsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Wiley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Aid for Women v. FoulstonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Wiley ex rel. Wiley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993