Legal Opinion

Talbot v. Kuhn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The .facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOhamplin, C. J.

The record in this case shows that the suit was brought before a justice of the peace; that the declaration was in assumpsit on all the common counts, and specially on a certain judgment rendered by Felix A. Lempke, a justice of the peace for Wayne county, May 21', 1885, for the sum of $121.69 damages and $1.50 costs, which said judgment was removed by transcript to the circuit court, June M, 1887, the same being file No. 1,596 in said circuit court. The plea was the general issue, and the result a judgment for defendant.

The plaintiffs appealed to the circuit court, and, to maintain the issue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Redman v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Bossence v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Smith v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoben v. Citizens' Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Scott v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Brown v. KnopMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Charles Bakrow & Co. v. TottenMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Stolte, Dangel & Foss Co. v. CochranMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API