Orosco v. Poarch
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Justice.
A motion for rehearing was granted in this case for the purpose of correcting an erroneous statement in the original opinion concerning the geological and chemical character of silicon dioxide and any erroneous conclusions of law or fact naturally or necessarily flowing therefrom. We adopt as a part of this opinion on rehearing the statement of facts and the quotations from the evidence in the original decision, the same as if they were incorporated herein.
In our original opinion we unfortunately relied solely upon the record made by both counsel for the commission (acting as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corporation v. FordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Utah Const. Co. v. BergArizona Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Zinc Company v. HainlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. AlittoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Climax Molybdenum Company v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Inspiration Consolidated Copper v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977