Legal Opinion
United States v. Rory Alan Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 8, 2016No. 15-1761PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Rory Alan Mitchell appeals his 151-month sentence for two counts of bank robbery, asserting both procedural error and substantive unreasonableness. Because we conclude that the district court’s 1 procedural error in calculating the applicable Guidelines range was harmless, and the sentence imposed was not unreasonable, we affirm.
Mitchell was charged with three counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). On October 24, 2014, Mitchell pleaded guilty to two counts pursuant to a written plea agreement. At the plea hearing, Mitchell stipulated to the legal and factual details in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. MinerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Delaney Poor BearCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Keith ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Darryl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Joel MayokokCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Candice DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Jalen McSmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Randall DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.