Legal Opinion

In re John R. Sheehan & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Separate appeals by Herman A., Metz, as comptroller of the city of New York, and by the Fitzgibbons Boiler Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made.-at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the c]erk of the county of New York on the 14tli day of July, 1909, denying a motion made by said boiler company to vacate an order theretofore entered herein discharging certain notices of the delivery of material under a conditional bill of sale.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

The order from which the appeal was taken was evidently made on the theory that the notices that the material was delivered under a conditional bill of sale, by which title was not to pass until payment of the contract price, in effect, constituted a mechanic’s lien, and it directs that they be discharged the same as if they were mechanics’ liens, on the giving of the undertaking by the contractor who has a contract with the city made by the board of trustees of the Bellevue and allied ■ hospitals for the performance of certain work at the G-ouverneur Hospital. The Fitzgibbons…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Philipp Bros. Chemicals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. Fitzgibbons Boiler Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API