Legal Opinion

Hestle v. Louisville N. R. Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1919No. 1 Div. 283PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Circuit Court, Monroe Coun* ty; Ben D. Turner, Judge. Action by Mrs. Mattie Emma Hestle against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company for damages for failure to deliver a trunk and its contents. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The plaintiff purchased of the defendant’s agent a ticket from Beatrice, a regular station on defendant’s railroad, to Monroe, another station ort the same line about 16 miles distant. On this ticket the plaintiff delivered to the defendant a trunk and its contents, as baggage, to be transported to the point of her destination and for delivery to her there. The defendant issued a check to the plaintiff for the trunk, but the trunk has never been delivered. The coffP plaint claims damages of the defendant, both as a carrier and as a warehouseman. The ease was tried on the plea of the general…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pace v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Seals v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Boshell v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Louisville N. R. Co. v. HestleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spreitler v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API