Legal Opinion
BRASSFIELD v. STATE
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 27, 2024No. 2024 OK 9PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OSCN Found Document:BRASSFIELD v. STATE
Previous Case
Top Of Index
This Point in Index
Citationize
Next Case
Print Only
BRASSFIELD v. STATE
2024 OK 9
Case Number: 119998
Decided: 02/27/2024
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cite as: 2024 OK 9, __ P.3d __
ANDREW DALE BRASSFIELD, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Defendant/Appellee.
ON CERTIORARI FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, DIVISION III
¶0 Appellant sought to expunge his arrest records pursuant to 22 O.S. Supp. 2022, § 18(A). The Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation objected, arguing that Appellant was not qualified for expungement…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McGirt v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Protective Health Services State Department of Health v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Question Submitted by: The Honorable Chris Kannady, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 91, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2024
- Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mike Osburn, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 81, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2024
- Questions Submitted by: The Honorable Melissa Provenzano, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 79, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2025