Albert J. Hackl, Sr. And Christine M. Hackl v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Most post-retirement hobbies don’t involve multi-million dollar companies or land retirees in hot water with the IRS, but those are the circumstances in this case. Albert J. (A.J.) and Christine M. Hackl began a tree-farming business after A.J.’s retirement and gave shares in the company to family members. The Hackls believed the transfers were excludable from the gift tax, but the IRS thought otherwise. The Tax Court agreed with the IRS, Hackl v. Comm’r, 118 T.C. 279, 2002 WL 467117 (2002), resulting in a gift tax deficiency of roughly $400,000 for the couple.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fondren v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Commissioner v. DisstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- James A. Pittman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Charles Reynolds and Beatrice Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Viteri v. PfluckerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Buckardt v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
- Price v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010