Legal Opinion

Williams v. Casebeer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Reynolds Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. G-reen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

— This litigation involves the good faith of an alleged purchase of a stock of goods. The plaintiff attached a portion of the stock as the property of Casebeer. Smyth, the interpleader, filed his interplea claiming to have purchased the goods from Casebeer. In answer to the interplea, Williams charged that the *645pretended sale was a sham, concocted to cheat and defraud the creditors of Casebeer. The finding and .judgment were against Smyth, and he has appealed.

The points arising for decision under this record are substantially the same as those presented in the case of Peters-Miller Shoe Co.,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Potter v. McDowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  2. Lew Weinrich & Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  3. Steward ex rel. Grantham v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
  4. Sutter v. LackmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  5. Fink & Nasse v. AlgermissenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Toms v. WhitmoreWyoming Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Maze v. GriffinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. H. T. Simon-Gregory Dry Goods Co. v. McMahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. White v. GibsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API