Legal Opinion · Concurrence

O'QUINN v. State Bar of Texas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1988No. C-6790Published

1ConcurrenceGonzalez, Justice

I concur in the result reached by the Court but do not agree with its reasoning. We should have swiftly and summarily held that the trial court committed error in ruling on the constitutionality of the disciplinary rules because the trial court could have denied the injunction on other grounds. I am also concerned that by ruling on the constitutional claim asserted here by way of a request for injunctive relief, we have set a dangerous precedent *405that will come back to haunt us. Other ingenious lawyers seeking to gain a postponement of a trial on the merits will buy time for their clients by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. LogueTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. San Antonio General Drivers, Helpers Local No. 657 v. ThorntonTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS, INC. v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Coker v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API