Legal Opinion

Daggett v. Samuel Bonat & Bro.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 10, 1948No. 5401PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal in a trade-mark opposition proceeding, under tbe Trade-Mark Act of February 20,1905, from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, 70 TJSPQ, 364, reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences sustaining appellant’s notice of opposition to the registration of appellee’s trade-mark, the dominant feature of which is “Harol.” The term “Bonat” was included in the application but was disclaimed apart from the mark as shown.

In its application for registration, appellee stated that it had used its mark on its goods, comprising hair shampoo and hair shampoo liquid cream…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pratt & Lambert, Inc. v. Chapman & Rodgers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API