In re the Marriage of Byerley
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Bjorgen, A.C.J.
¶1 James H. Cail and Margaret Byerley separated and ultimately divorced 414 years after they married. Their marriage followed 10 years of unmarried cohabitation. Cail appeals from the dissolution decree and associated qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by (1) characterizing the house in which Byerley and Cail resided as community property and calculating the final property distribution based on that characterization, (2) erroneously calculating the parties’ community and separate interests in their pensions, resulting…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Connell v. FranciscoWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re Estate of ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- In re the Marriage of LanghamWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Marriage of LanghamWashington Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lora Perry, App v. Kennet Phillipson, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019