Russo v. Inserra Supermarkets
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joan B. Lefkowitz, J.
CPLR 3042 (d) requires the party who believes that the responses to a demand for a bill of particulars are insufficient, to move within 10 days after receipt of the bill except that the 10-day period does not apply where "special circumstances” are shown.
*358At bar, movant received the bill of particulars at the latest on July 15, 1991. On that date counsel for movant wrote a letter to plaintiffs’ attorney regarding the alleged insufficiency of the bill. The letter was also an effort to comply with the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts which require an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hess v. WessendorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Martin v. We're Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Golowaty v. Machnick Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Pacos Construction Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Anzalone v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986